I just received 6X6X6 that came with a couple of bonus books; just advertised on my email acct. Great value and great information!
Just a few weeks earlier, I had ordered and received Full Body Attack. Darrin sent me an email with a chance for some feedback. I asked some questions about the routine, but I meant to mention one critique I had on the book.
One paragraph of the ebook stirred up great debate at our house, and I somewhat take a position opposite Darrin on this. I hope Darrin don't mind, but here is the paragraph that got our family debating:
While this program doesn't go into detail on eating habits, let me be clear: your eating habits are far more important than your exercise habits for your health and your appearance. Exercise helps, and becomes critical once you are ready to move into the top 20% in terms of fitness, strength, and appearance. But eating habits will always be more important. – Full body Attack p. 5 By Darrin Clement
I disagree, and I think it's the opposite of what Darrin states. I think exercise is more important for the beginner and diet becomes more important for the top 20% of one's potential. Here is my reasoning. We could take four sedentary persons of the same sex, age and body type, fat percentage, etc. One person would not change a thing and would be the control subject. Another person would not change his/her diet but begin a total fitness regimen (resistance, flexibility, and cardio); the third subject would change his or her diet geared towards a perfect combination of macro and micro nutrients, timing, etc., but not change his or her activity level; and the fourth person would change both his or her diet and and begin the same exercise regiment.
It is clear that person four would get the most improvement, but I'd be willing to bet that subject two would get the second best results in a four to twelve month trial. While it is true that a person could get dramatic, immediate weight loss on a severe calorie deficit, such a plan would catch up with him or her as his or her metabolism slowed, and this would not be the diet used in the trial anyway, since we're talking about eating right; not simply eating less. In fact, some overweight people don't even eat too much; they're just too out of shape and don't burn enough calories each day.
You can't get that furnace burning if you're not exercising no matter how good the diet is.
I think that if a sedentary fat person simply diets, he or she will just be a more slender fat person (that is less overall weight and size but still too much body fat and poor body composition; better but not good), and if a too thin person simply eats more, he or she will go from a skinny person to a slender fat person; but if either of these body types begin a great workout program, he or she will start becoming more muscular, will get more of a v-shape appearance, will have better posture and confidence, and will start to look and feel better in general. However, for someone to get beyond that initial improvement, he or she will have to improve his or her diet and that diet gets more important as one moves towards his or her potential.
My only alibi to my theory is regarding the extreme ectomorph, which is in the great minority. If one is too thin or small, then muscle will not grow w/o enough calories, so it would depend on the calorie intake before the trial began. If there is already a calorie deficit, then the deficit would become more pronounced once an exercise program began and would not allow one to gain any muscle; only lose more fat and become even more skinny. But, at the same time, if this too-thin person only eats more, he or she will (at best) gain no more muscle than fat. So, in this scenario, both are equally important, but diet becomes more important as the ectomorph progresses much sooner than for other body types.