| User | Post |
|
1:55 am June 27, 2011
| Grant
| | |
| Member | posts 11 | |
|
|
Hi,
I have been running for 18 months and have reduced my weight from 100kg to 85kg in that time. I've also been doing a small amount of full body weights during this time to help with my weight loss goals and have managed to build some good muscle as a result. All good so far right?
My problem is very large thighs. I am at the stage of weight loss where despite my 23% remnant body fat (scales may not be perfect i Know) I have very good muscular definition in my lower/upper legs and bum, but my upper legs and but are very muscular and I really don't want them to get any bigger. I already have trouble finding pants with waistlines that fit me to be big enough in the legs.
Can I continue the excellent calorie burning benefits of weightlifting with legs without them getting bigger?
|
|
|
5:25 am June 27, 2011
| Cameron
| | Greensboro, NC | |
| Member | posts 250 | 
|
|
|
I've had this problem my whole life…. still working on it at the moment, lol.
|
|
|
7:21 am June 27, 2011
| gregsfc
| | Rickman, Tennessee | |
| Member | posts 145 | |
|
|
Wow! Compared to being a hardgainer, you've got it made. Wish I was dealing with something so good, although I do understand your frustration with asymmetry!
We all have to deal with body parts that tend to out do other areas, which can cause appearance problems and even injuries due to strength imbalances if you let it get out of hand. My areas are my upper back (mostly traps) and my upper quad muscles. However, I can't seem to gain any muscle anywhere else. My chest appears sunken in, because my upper back dwarfs my pecs., even though I work my pecs hard. My legs are very small, but the upper quads are over develped compared to the muscles around my knees or my back side. These imbalances are frustrating. It's very hard to overcome this leg imbalance compared to the opposite situation, because the power in one's lower body is in his or her back side; not the quads. Without the natural ability to gain strength and size in my lower backside, it's hard to make overall progress. I do exercises to work against these imbalances, but having said that, I wouldn't give up my strong, big upper back for nothing, because it's the only thing I've got to show for my hard work.
With your situation, think of it this way. Big, muscular butt and thighs is the foundation for a great athlete and/or a great body builder. This means that you probably have huge potential for muscle gain everywhere, because, your core strength areas are already well developed, and you probably have alot of fast-twitch muscle fibers as compared to slow twitch fibers,. This generally means that you are a person that easily gains fat and muscle, so you must be more strict with your diet than someone like me, and, eventually, you'll have to do some isolation work to correct these imbalances.
Dealing with these issues is much easier than dealing with a body that refuses to gain muscle. You can overcome or reduce these problems with discipline and consistency in training and nutrition. On the contrary, I can do everything right and still be too small and lack muscle mass.
Keep doing what you're doing and don't worry about it at this point. As you gain muscle everywhere else and lose fat, you'll start looking great!
|
|
|
12:00 pm June 27, 2011
| Darrin
| | |
| Admin
| posts 310 | |
|
|
Yeah, Grant, like Greg I'm a bit jealous. I struggle adding mass to my legs.
In terms of your question, it sounds to me like your current goals are overall fat loss. I didn't hear you saying that you want to gain mass in your upper body. At 23% bodayfat (or thereabouts) I would definitely suggest a calorie deficit to get down to at most 15% before trying to work more on muscular cosmetics. So in that regard, if you are truly pursuing fat loss aggressively, it is really unlikely you will add mass to your legs. So nothing to worry about. Still do your squats, deads, etc. but I would recommend just doing low volume, heavy sets to keep up your strength. So, 3 sets of 5 reps or something. And in terms of running, if you don't want to add leg mass, then you probably want to keep sprinting to a minimum. You might be the type who adds leg mass from sprints. Your focus for the next 3-6 months needs to be all about how you eat.
|
|
|
1:40 pm June 27, 2011
| Cameron
| | Greensboro, NC | |
| Member | posts 250 | 
|
|
|
I tend to have large thighs, butt, shoulders, and upper back.
|
|
|
9:41 pm June 27, 2011
| Grant
| | |
| Member | posts 11 | |
|
|
Thanks Greg and Darrin. I've never thought to look at this as an advantage, despite knowing that it made me a very strong tackler in soccer (football for the purists).
I've been working on my body fat for 18 months now and made good steady progress with lifestyle changes and hard work. I'm still losing inches all over (except legs). I'm not sure how accurate my scales are. They were only $50AUS and report mass, body fat % and Muscle % currently 84.9kg, 23.3 %blubber and 40.0% guns.
Do you think its worth seeing if I can get a professional analysis done to see where I'm at, and get an idea of the accuracy of the scales?
Like most guys, one of my biggest goals is to expose those ABS and I know that fody fat % is the key. I can feel them in there and there only seems to be 1/2 an inch or so of cover left, but it is damned stubborn!
It's great to know that the bits I dislike are actually helping me in my goal though.
Thanks again.
|
|
|
7:36 pm June 28, 2011
| gregsfc
| | Rickman, Tennessee | |
| Member | posts 145 | |
|
|
Grant said:
I've never thought to look at this as an advantage, despite knowing that it made me a very strong tackler in soccer (football for the purists).
See. I knew by your description that you are a natural athlete!
Great attitude and great work at sticking with it.
Darrin is more qualified to answer your inquiries than me about measuring benchmarks towards your goals, but personally, although it's important to have objective and measurable goals, I'm not sure how important the accuracy of the numbers are as long as they are accurate at measuring your progress. Your progress is what is important; not how you compare to anyone else, or the actual numbers themselves as perceived by the fitness media.
I would also caution about setting goals too high. We all have images of what we would like our appearance to be. Those images are usually derived from pictures or personal encounters with genetically gifted individuals that have great natural symmetry; low fat percentage; and great muscle mass, sometimes enhanced with illegal drugs. It is very difficult for me to gain muscle, but I could lose a few pounds and have great looking abs, though my arms would shrink a little to under 14" and my legs would be even smaller than they are now. So if my abs look like Frank Zane, it's of little use if my waist is the same size as my chest.
I'm just saying, as you continue to progress, be reasonable about your goals and realize progress will get slower as you get more fit. You should be able to lose enough fat to see your abs, but keep in mind, your body type may not lend towards your abs being your strong point no more than I'll ever be a person with big, strong thighs.
|
|
|
9:51 pm June 28, 2011
| Cameron
| | Greensboro, NC | |
| Member | posts 250 | 
|
|
|
I'd say no. The scale may be off, but as long as it's consistently off, then it's okay. It's kind of like weighing. As long as you use the same scale every time you weigh it doesn't matter if it's off. I can weigh 135 on one scale and 137 on another, but if I lose a pound it will be 134 on one scale and 136 respectively. Didn't matter if It's off, I still saw a -1 lb. either way. You should be more worried about how much fat you lose, not how much you have.
|
|
|
7:12 am June 29, 2011
| Darrin
| | |
| Admin
| posts 310 | |
|
|
I've always been skeptical of the scales that measure bodyfat, but Cameron is spot on – all that matters is that your measurement system is consistent. You lose a pound, then any scale will show that, just keep using the same scale.
Where this gets trickier though is with your goal to see your abs. Most guys start seeing abs at around 10% bodyfat. No, this isn't a firm rule. But it's a benchmark to work towards and so it might be that if you are seeking 10% bodyfat, your existing scale may be off. But I think that is a minor issue, because truth is some guys don't really see their abs until 8% and other guys start seeing abs at 12%. So, stick with your system, and just keep making progress until you like what you see in the mirror (assuming also that you feel good and healthy overall).
|
|