You must be logged in to post Login Register


Register? | Lost Your Password?

Search Forums:


 






Minimum search word length is 3 characters – Maximum search word length is 84 characters
Wildcard Usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Undulating Periodicity
Read original blog post

UserPost

10:41 am
June 28, 2010


Darrin

Admin

posts 310

Last week we talked about basic linear periodization.  But over the past decade, several studies have shown the high value of a different form of periodization:  undulating periodization.

For example, see this.

But it's interesting to note that comparisons of different periodization models for beginners does NOT show undulating periodization to be superior.  (See this.)

I've seen evidence of this myself, so I suggest linear periodization for beginners, and even intermediates.

For more advanced lifters, undulating periodicity is quite valuable.  But you have to do it right.

Undulating Periodization

One of the reasons you might not have ever done undulating periodization – or even heard of it – is that it's much more complicated to do (not to mention hard to pronounce!).  Some people also call in "nonlinear periodization" but undulating is more accurate.

To save on the typing, I'm going to use UP as the abbreviation.

If you are not keeping a training log, forget about UP.  There's no way you can keep track of it all in your head week after week.

The basic idea with undulating periodicity is that you switch among strength-hypertrophy-conditioning regimens much more frequently than in linear periodization.

Weekly vs. Daily Undulating Periodization

The original studies of UP were weekly.  Meaning, you'd do a week of low-load, high rep lifts, then a week of medium load, medium rep lifts, then a week of high load, low rep lifts.  Let's call that WUP.

But when I mentioned earlier that UP is a relatively recent development in the history of resistance training, I was referring to the daily variation (DUP) – here you are changing the protocol within each week.

And since then, when most people talk about UP, they mean DUP.

An example of DUP for someone on a full-body routine lifting M, W and F is

M=muscular endurance, W=hypertrophy, F=strength.

M = 4 sets of each exercise, targeting 12-15 reps

W = 4 sets of each exercise, targeting 8-12 reps

F = 5 sets of each exercise, targeting 4-6 reps

What About DUP For Split Routines?

Here's how daily undulating periodicity would look for The 6x6x6 Routine:

(Note – here's a brief description of The 6x6x6 Routine:  upper/lower split routine; normally advocates 6 reps per set, but includes a couple lower rep, heavier weight sets in each workout using a principal called "wave loading" that I'll have to explain some other time.  For this example, I'm just using the 6-rep sets for illustration.  There are multiple ways you could apply periodization to The 6x6x6 Routine, or any routine for that matter.)

  • Day 1: Upper Body – target 12 reps per set
  • Day 2: Lower Body – target 12 reps per set
  • Day 3:  recovery
  • Day 4:  Upper Body – target 8 reps per set
  • Day 5: Lower Body – target 8 reps per set
  • Day 6:  recovery
  • Day 7:  recovery
  • Day 8: Upper Body – target 4 reps per set
  • Day 9: Lower Body – target 4 reps per set
  • Day 10:  recovery
  • Day 11:  Upper Body – target 12 reps per set
  • Day 12: Lower Body – target 12 reps per set
  • Day 13:  recovery
  • Day 14:  recovery
  • repeat

You might find that you want to adjust the timing of the 2-back-to-back recovery days based on your own recovery time (some people take longer to recover from the 4-rep workouts than they do from the 8-rep workouts, for example).  If you own The 6x6x6 Routine and have questions about how to apply DUP, just email me.

Even if you are on a "bodybuilder" type of routine that emphasizes body-part splits, there is some anecdotal evidence that UP can help.  Arnold (and countless others) talk about doing "heavy days" and "light days" to help stimulate muscle growth.  Since modern bodybuilders are almost all on drugs, it's hard to get a good study going that shows the impact of UP on pure-hypertrophy (which is why almost all the science is about impacts of UP on strength gains).

Some Cautions

One thing to avoid with DUP, or WUP as well, is using too high of a rep scheme.  For example, studies have shown that if your muscular endurance sessions target 20 or more reps, rather than a more moderate 12 reps, that you actually lose strength on a UP protocol.

If your goal is fat loss, no study I'm aware of has shown that there's any advantage to any periodization model for fat loss.  Doesn't mean there's no connection, but it hasn't been proven.  My own belief is that it could help when you are already lean and are trying to get ultralean but not distinctive if you are the average person trying to lose some fat.

And I'll end where I started – this is not required for beginners.  Most studies comparing LP to DUP (or LP to WUP) show that for beginners there isn't much difference.  In fact, beginners don't even need LP – you can just keep slowly increasing the weight or reps (progressive overload) and make most of the progress.  LP, WUP, and especially DUP are complicated and if you are just starting out you can get discouraged.  Remember, sticking to a decent routine and protocol is far better than inconsistently doing an amazing routine.

Questions?  Fire away!


Read original blog post

6:32 pm
June 30, 2010


gregsfc

Rickman, Tennessee

Member

posts 145

I tried lots of routines, but never anything like UP.  I may give it a go soon, as I work on my next plan of attack!

4:03 pm
July 2, 2010


gregsfc

Rickman, Tennessee

Member

posts 145

I tried doing the high-rep portion of this routine today.  I have a few questions and comments.

Should I pick a weight that I can do 12 reps on the first set, or a weight that I can complete 12 reps on all four sets?  In other words, should I be going close to failure?

I started with hang cleans.  On my previous workout, I did five sets of five reps, increasing the weight with each set.  Only the last set was really tough on that routine.  I worked up to 135# and that was about all I could do in strict form for five reps.

This time, I was trying for 12 reps.  I picked 115 lbs.  It was about right for two sets but my respiratory exhaustion and tiring forearms took its toll on the last two and I got only eleven and ten, respectively.  I used chaulk on my hands to help my hands stay dry.

I then went to dumbell deadlifts.  Approximately 180 lbs.  I was going for three sets.  I did the first set at 12; second @ 11; and third @ 10.  Again, my forearms and respiration kept me from completing the second and third set to 12.

I then went to wide-grip pullups; no added weight.  I planned to do one set of 12; then one set of 5, supersetted with 7 reps of wide-grip lat downs.  The third set would be all wide-grip lat downs.  My forearms failed me after 8 reps on the third set.

I liked this routine, because I haven't worn out my forearms to failure in years.

I then went to lying, dumbell pullovers, with a 60 lb dumbell.  I haven't done this exercise with this weight in my life, so I did only two sets of eight of these.  In other words, I didn't want to go near failure yet, but I think I could have done twelve, at least on the first set.

This routine was much more exhausting than my previous, five-rep workout, but not as hard as a high-rep squat routine that I was doing about three weeks ago.

 

10:10 pm
July 2, 2010


Cameron

Greensboro, NC

Member

posts 250

Any time you do any type of clean or snatch for high reps it will wear you out.  It's due to the explosive nature.  If I did 12 reps with 185 it would feel the same if I did 135 to me.  Provided you actually explode and have proper for like you should.  The only real difference would be the speed at which the bar moved, in theory at least.  In practice, it's a different story when you add the mental aspect to it. 

At 12 reps with hang cleans even the bar might wear me out a little.   I Don't really clean that high.  I usually have my clean reps about 1/2 the amount as my other sets, for that reason.  Besides, with it being so explosive anything over 8-10 reps doesn't do much good, strengthwise.  And even then, 10 reps is really pushing it.  That's one of the things that really bothers me about most "power workouts" people do.  In order to build power you need high weight, low reps, and speed mixed in. (That means less weight than a normal strength workout.)  But people will grab a 15 lb. dumbbell and do a snatch for 15 reps and think they are building speed, when at that point it's just endurance.  The purpose is to fire your muscle maximally, every rep.  Which you can't do after a few reps.

2:54 pm
July 3, 2010


gregsfc

Rickman, Tennessee

Member

posts 145

Great information! 

The whole reason I've begun working in power movements is the theory I've read about where persons with small builds and high endurance probably have fewer fast-twitch muscle fibers available to them.  These same persons (those like me), probably have more  muscle fibers for endurance, therefore, people like me can easily work up to running 10 miles per session, but have more trouble with explosive power and strength.  This is certainly true in my case.

The theory goes, that even though I can't change my makeup of fast and slow muscle fibers, it is possible to change the in-between fibers (I think called type IA) to act more like fast-twitch fibers, and that doing explosive-type training may help me achieve this.  The theory states that by improving fast-twitch performance, one will be able to gain size and strength more readily, since these-type fibers respond and grow better.

Now, I'm probably not stating this theory exactly correct and I'm sure I've simplified it, but I have noticed that I can now pick up a 40 lb dumbell and curl it around five times (not that this is one of my big 7).  Before doing movements like hang cleans and push presses, I could not do this, even if I did nothing but an arm routine twice per week.

With respect to squats, I've not been able to turn this exercise into a power movement, because I simply can't get any speed at the bottom of the lift.  This may explain why I haven't noticed much progress towards anything from doing squats.  Deadlifts are somewhat better but my poor strength with my upper legs parralell keeps me from making this an explosive move, at least with heavy weight.

5:12 pm
July 3, 2010


Darrin

Admin

posts 310

Yeah, Cameron is dead on. 

Greg – you are right that some people have more fast twitch and other people have more slow twitch.  But the difference isn't usually that significant.  Like all things, there's a spectrum.  Compare the most elite power lifters or sprinters to the elite marathoners or distance cyclists and you'd see a big difference in fiber type.  But the rest of us are a lot closer to each other than you might think.  Training and diet have a big impact.  You are right that the IIa fibers can be trained to act like either type I or type IIb (slow or fast twitch respectively).  And as Cameron was saying, if someone trains power movements with endurance rep schemes, they are kinda defeating the purpose.

I too have trouble "firing" on squats as a power move.  But if you do hang cleans deeply (where you really are doing a front squat in the second half of the movement), you get a power-type front squat in there.  That'd be my suggestion for someone who wants to learn some explosiveness is squats.  Disclaimer:  I am NOT a power lifter, thought I try to include  some power moves in most of my routines, and would defer to others with more expertise here.


About the World Fitness Network Forum

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1
Forums: 9
Topics: 197
Posts: 998

Membership:

There are 781 Members
There have been 2 Guests

There is 1 Admin

Top Posters:

Cameron – 250
gregsfc – 145
truparad0x – 25
gene – 24
shanidev – 20
Mlisica19 – 17

Recent New Members: oyyou2, Midwestc32, rbrown, sundaejackson, RussReynolds, shellydisuja

Administrators: Darrin (310 Posts)